|
Post by Bamafan on Jan 6, 2014 23:13:24 GMT
Just look at the length of the list of Users Online in the Last 24 Hours now! (46 in all) Can't remember ever seeing it that long before. No doubt Hayley and Arnaud's Wedding Album is the big attraction. That is a nice arrangement. Not to mention the almost 1000 guests!! -Taylor i.postimg.cc/9fYxy370/smilie-big-grin.gif
|
|
|
Post by Libby on Jan 6, 2014 23:23:51 GMT
The Christchurch Press got the year of her proposal wrong, too. Very few have gotten it right, and one of them was Woman's Day. Which means most of the online sources have been wrong.
|
|
|
Post by frenchie on Jan 7, 2014 0:09:42 GMT
You welcome Joe! I would hope a lot of fans would check in on the wedding...this is a big deal!
|
|
|
Post by stevemacdonald on Jan 7, 2014 0:16:36 GMT
Just look at the length of the list of Users Online in the Last 24 Hours now! ( 46 in all) .... That's a good sign!
|
|
|
Post by grant on Jan 7, 2014 9:04:59 GMT
Lovely pic here from one of Hayley's friends who was a guest at the wedding Best wishes Grant
|
|
Jillian
Global Moderator
Posts: 3,050
|
Post by Jillian on Jan 7, 2014 9:29:52 GMT
|
|
Jillian
Global Moderator
Posts: 3,050
|
Post by Jillian on Jan 7, 2014 14:31:19 GMT
Wow, thank you Ross, what a marvellous start! As we discussed, I have now created a special sub-board exclusive to forum members for these scans and so any further ones will be moved into there by our forum staff. Here is the exclusive sub-board for members: Hayley and Arnaud's Wedding AlbumCheers, Dave Just thought I would quote this again in case anyone missed it
|
|
|
Post by Libby on Jan 8, 2014 6:26:58 GMT
That is funny. i.postimg.cc/9fYxy370/smilie-big-grin.gif But I admit I didn't notice the difference. I enjoy reading descriptive writing (as I also enjoy writing using vivid vocabulary), and I think I was too busy trying to absorb every detail, to try to imagine the beautiful day, that it didn't even occur to me who was mentioned when. The bride is normally the center of attention at weddings, so I don't think that was abnormal. I've never read any romances by the author you mention, either, so I wouldn't know about that.
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Jan 8, 2014 8:19:57 GMT
This made me chuckle this morning. Click on the link to see the rest of the article, which isn't about the wedding. Richard
|
|
Jillian
Global Moderator
Posts: 3,050
|
Post by Jillian on Jan 8, 2014 8:53:14 GMT
That is funny. But I admit I didn't notice the difference. I enjoy reading descriptive writing (as I also enjoy writing using vivid vocabulary), and I think I was too busy trying to absorb every detail, to try to imagine the beautiful day, that it didn't even occur to me who was mentioned when. The bride is normally the center of attention at weddings, so I don't think that was abnormal. I've never read any romances by the author you mention, either, so I wouldn't know about that. Hi Libby, Mills and Boon is a publishing house that specialises in romance novels. Think anything that looks like this: Need I say anymore? ha ha ha
|
|
|
Post by Paddy on Jan 8, 2014 10:43:18 GMT
That is funny. But I admit I didn't notice the difference. I enjoy reading descriptive writing (as I also enjoy writing using vivid vocabulary), and I think I was too busy trying to absorb every detail, to try to imagine the beautiful day, that it didn't even occur to me who was mentioned when. The bride is normally the center of attention at weddings, so I don't think that was abnormal. I've never read any romances by the author you mention, either, so I wouldn't know about that. Hi Libby, Mills and Boon is a publishing house that specialises in romance novels. Think anything that looks like this: Need I say anymore? ha ha ha Hi Jillian, I don't share your 'Ha Ha' at all. I've read and enjoyed many Mills & Boon novels and make no apologies for it. 'Syrupy' - strange literary term? If 'syrupy' means 'romantic', long live romance, especially for the wedding of two wonderful young people. What really gets me though is the pseudo-expert tone of the 'humorous' article you quote, which is really just cheap, dismissive and inane (and somewhat vulgar) gossip - so typical of gossip columnists who have little or nothing to contribute by way of worthwhile comment on a much better written article. To use their idiom, 'Get a life!', I say. Paddy
|
|
Jillian
Global Moderator
Posts: 3,050
|
Post by Jillian on Jan 8, 2014 12:57:31 GMT
www.thefreedictionary.com/syrupy - see, it is actually a word I think the satirical articles listed above serve as good PR for Hayley in that they provide some humour, personality and relevance to the news about her. They help provide some contrast to the rather sober and very conservative media image which has been created for Hayley.
|
|
|
Post by Bamafan on Jan 8, 2014 14:34:04 GMT
I understand both of yall's viewpoints. The Woman's Day article is good for Hayley fans, who want to feel like we were there. The other, much more succinct article, I think could serve as a hook to some. They read the humorously-toned snippet, and get interested in the wedding. I mean, it doesn't say anything at all negative towards Hayley; it just put a more lighthearted spin on the whole thing. -Taylor i.postimg.cc/9fYxy370/smilie-big-grin.gif
|
|
|
Post by Paddy on Jan 8, 2014 14:55:43 GMT
www.thefreedictionary.com/syrupy - see, it is actually a word I think the satirical articles listed above serve as good PR for Hayley in that they provide some humour, personality and relevance to the news about her. They help provide some contrast to the rather sober and very conservative media image which has been created for Hayley. Of course it's a (conversational) word but not a recognisable term in literary criticism. Good PR (by indirection) perhaps - a 'hook' (as Bamafan suggests) - for some who might share the flippant negativity of the writers. The 'humour' escapes me but the (lack of) personality is obvious. Relevance maybe - the odd time anything is actually said. Contrast-wise it's chalk and cheese maybe. I would have said 'traditional', 'tasteful' or 'dignified' rather than 'rather sober' and 'very conservative' but leaving aside your hint of being too much so or somehow inappropriate to the occasion and the people involved. All depends perhaps on how broad one's perspectives are. Paddy
|
|
|
Post by Libby on Jan 9, 2014 3:20:57 GMT
I think we're all getting a bit too serious here if you ask me. The part I thought was mildly funny was the part about the abridged version. I guess I meant it as a sort of stupid funny. I don't think their perspective of it all is really worth getting all indignant. It was probably someone who has little if any interest in weddings, if all they can say about it is that it was raining.
As for Jillian's description of the article, syrupy is similar to the word "drippy". I didn't necessarily agree with her description, since I loved reading the article, but that is her opinion. She is not a professional literary critic, so I don't see why we're so concerned about what words she uses.
|
|