|
Post by Stephany on May 4, 2007 9:11:03 GMT
Hi everyone, I think we all agree on the fact that Hayley has affected a lot of people through her "generous personality and heart-felt singing" (see Eric's original post here) . I think Hayley rightly deserves to be look up to. Yet, I found an article from August 2005 in "The Press NZ" that says exactly the contrary.
|
|
|
Post by Stephany on May 4, 2007 9:15:56 GMT
Leonie Jackson refers to an article by Keri Welham dated August 4, 2005. Here is the original article to fully comprehend Mrs Jackson's reaction.
|
|
|
Post by grant on May 4, 2007 9:46:38 GMT
So I guess we wouldn't have much trouble working out which student group Leoni Jackson belonged too!! She says singing is "like a hobby". The major difference between a hobby and a career, of course, is that the latter has probably made Westenra a teenage millionairess, although she says she does not know how much money she has. "I don't even know if I'm a millionaire. It's all in the system, money going back and forwards," she says. I like this article. I don't think I've ever heard Hayley's wealth referred to before and I just love the way she reacted - matter of fact, don't really care. Way to go Hayley!! Best wishes Grant
|
|
|
Post by postscript on May 4, 2007 10:59:30 GMT
It is disappointing to find that there are elements in NZ that are following the dummying down tradition that is wrecking this country (UK) and sneering at ability, aspiration and achievement. The original theory behind this attitude was founded in an understandable social conscience--that the success stories of life over-ride the reality of the majority and all too easily contribute to depression and a lack of self-worth. The article (Hayley no model) is very badly written. Ignore the bad writing and it raises valid points. - Arguably the Keri Welham article was disparaging about 'student life'. However, isn't that the way students have always been regarded, intellectually able or not?
- Leonie Jackson is effectively saying, 'why must we always concentrate on major success rather than the success stories of the lesser able who achieve 'normality' against many personal disadvantages.
Fair comment, but she's a journalist, so why isn't her article a positive article saying so: Hayley has used all her talents through hard work and...[example, example, example] have likewise used what talents they have to achieve against the odds, etc.
- More positively, 'Look at Hayley's success and 'wow!' she's still slumming it with her peers; taking it in her stride; is still a down-to-earth kid.'
'To walk with kings nor lose the common touch/If all men treat with you but none too much.' Kipling 'If'.
- Why doesn't Leoni champion the lesser known successes of whom she supposedly knows many?
- Why doesn't her paper publish such stories--because they don't sell, or they aren't considered stories? That's not Hayley's fault.
- Leoni writes in a 'chip on my shoulder' manner which undermines her own argument. To paraphrase W S Gilbert again, 'When anything will do, nothing is of value'
- Yes, Leoni is right that there is a wealth of superb success stories amongst our ordinary lives and most of those young people are happy to have those achievements recognised within the frame-work they operate.
In my experience they usually are. But to encourage an attitude 'We mustn't compete with one another because someone will lose' (poor little diddems) and that those who win should not be applauded is not the way to go about enthusing the less renowned members of society. After all, if they are worthy of more attention, they themselves will not want to be promoted beyond their own self-esteem.
Peter S.
|
|
|
Post by Eric on May 4, 2007 11:38:11 GMT
Hi Stephany and everyone, First of all, I think that's the first time I've ever had a link to one of my posts. i.postimg.cc/9fYxy370/smilie-big-grin.gif That's pretty cool, Stephany. Ok...anyway...the point of this post: It sounds as if the first article above "Hayley No Model" is not a direct attack to Hayley but rather the author of the second article. I agree with Grant, in that it is refreshing to know that at that point in her life she didn't really know how much money she had and wanted to pitch in when she could...it just further reinforces a few things for me, especially the fact that she is still a role model for many young (and teenage) girls, despite the first author's remarks. But then again, we're all entitled to our own opinion. (I always thought "rational" people would swarm to Hayley, though). Best, Eric
|
|
|
Post by Stephany on May 4, 2007 12:45:39 GMT
I have Hayley's age and although I don't "know" her for that long (for the record, I discovered her music last February), she has been a very strong source of inspiration since then. As listed in the article, I may not have her "faultless skin, dress size, vitamin pill taking and her fortune" (I don't even dare mention her singing talent ) but I definitely consider her as a role model, someone to look up to, be it simply for her simplicity and generosity. We can't blame her for being so sweet and adorable!
|
|
Martin
Global Moderator
HWI Management Team
Posts: 3,339
|
Post by Martin on May 4, 2007 12:55:55 GMT
Hi All Regarding Hayley's alleged "fortune", no one actually knows what she is worth nor should they as in my opinion this is a very personal subject. I remember Roger once saying that Hayley is still indebted to Decca so suffice to assume that Hayley is certainly not one of the "super" rich (except in quality of course! ). Martin
|
|
Dave
Administrator
HWI Admin
Posts: 7,700
|
Post by Dave on May 4, 2007 13:59:06 GMT
We should also remember when discussing old articles like this one that they are old and may not reflect the current situation. For example, I have noticed much less antagonism towards Hayley in 2007 in some of the NZ media than I did at the time Odyssey was released in 2005. Perhaps, finally, they have realised that Hayley is here to stay? Cheers, Dave
|
|
|
Post by stevemacdonald on May 4, 2007 15:00:42 GMT
...The article (Hayley no model) is very badly written.... Just to be fair to The Press and its capable writers, that wasn't an "article". It was simply a letter to the editor in response to an article (Hayley still hunts...).
|
|
|
Post by milewalker on May 4, 2007 21:04:55 GMT
For example, I have noticed much less antagonism towards Hayley in 2007 in some of the NZ media than I did at the time Odyssey was released in 2005. Cheers, Dave Absence makes the heart grow fonder Dave. I suspect that if she had a larger presence in NZ that the critics would crawl back out from under the woodwork. As an aside, the writer of that letter completely ignores one aspect of reality. Hayley is an international star (and she already was when this was written). The qualifications for that are very different than the challanges faced by ordinary teenagers. There may be some exceptions to the rule, but in general we do tend to choose our stars (and by extension, our cultural role models as well) from among the people who have many of the qualities lauded by the author of the original article. It would be nice if merely having "natural singing talent" was in and of itself a sufficient condition for Hayley to have achieved the level of success she has. Unfortunately, the real world doesnt see it that way. Jon
|
|
|
Post by postscript on May 6, 2007 16:13:19 GMT
...The article (Hayley no model) is very badly written.... Just to be fair to The Press and its capable writers, that wasn't an "article". It was simply a letter to the editor in response to an article (Hayley still hunts...). Thanks for the correction Steve. Peter S.
|
|
|
Post by Belinda on May 7, 2007 4:38:12 GMT
For example, I have noticed much less antagonism towards Hayley in 2007 in some of the NZ media than I did at the time Odyssey was released in 2005. Perhaps, finally, they have realised that Hayley is here to stay? Cheers, Dave Re Hayley here to stayI wrote a letter to the Press letters to the editor they cut it down to a small quote ,I'll post it here as it does not need it's own thread. I had mentioned Hayley was to be coming home soon and HWi and the great review from the Press reviewer, It was in on April 18th, Of my letter all they put in was Press reviewer Patrick Shepherd hit the nail on the head when reviewing Hayley's new album (April 7), He said the doubters need doubt no more Hayley Westenra has hit the world stage and looks every bit as if she's here to stay. belinda
|
|