|
|
Post by graemek on Dec 17, 2006 7:50:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by petertong on Feb 9, 2007 5:31:11 GMT
This is so cool to see... you see that small enclosed area on the bottom right picture? I think that may be the burial place for Joan de Beaufort and Catherine De Roet/Swinford (who I know are buried in Lincoln Cathedral). They are Hayley's 19th and 20th great Grandmothers respectively! Without them Hayley would not be here for us to enjoy her singing...
I wonder if she realized that?!
|
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Feb 9, 2007 9:14:16 GMT
Thanks for posting the beautiful screen captures, Graeme!  Peter, I deleted the quote from your post because it repeated the image. It is a rather large file which can take a long time to download, especially for our members with dial-up. Best Wishes, Richard  |
|
|
|
Post by postscript on Feb 9, 2007 15:41:02 GMT
That's fine, Richard I try to remember not to quote unnecessarily but perhaps that was one that slipped through!
Peter S.
|
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Feb 9, 2007 16:05:47 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by petertong on Feb 9, 2007 17:50:55 GMT
Thanks for posting the beautiful screen captures, Graeme! Peter, I deleted the quote from your post because it repeated the image. It is a rather large file which can take a long time to download, especially for our members with dial-up. Best Wishes, Richard Ah... thanks for doing that. I should be more conscious of that! Very lovely video! And as usual Hayley's voice is to my ears, as apple pie with ice cream are to my taste buds... i.postimg.cc/9fYxy370/smilie-big-grin.gif Yummy. |
|
|
|
Post by postscript on Feb 9, 2007 19:42:21 GMT
Glad I'm not YET entirely nuts! I just wished to reassure you I was okay with it while wondering what the heck you were talking about but decided it must be me!"  Peter S. |
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Feb 10, 2007 8:52:19 GMT
Hello Peter! You've demonstrated the big disadvantage of using the 'most recent posts' and search functions to catch up with the Forum. You lose the continuity in the threads!  Best Wishes, Richard  |
|
|
|
Post by postscript on Feb 10, 2007 9:24:02 GMT
You raise a point there, Richard, in your comment about reading threads in sequence as separate compartments and reading through the latest posts across the threads, to which there is quite a range of answers! - Shortness of time to visit while wanting to 'stay in touch'. Catching up after a long absence is very time-consuming and until one has caught up one is for ever feeling 'left out' as one finds matters in which one hasn't a clue what is being discussed.
- The daily Hayley dose of interacting.
- I find such a diversity of subjects that I involve myself in the discussions and forget the thread title--my life is not a neatly compartmented one. Nor are neat compartments the way I view life!
- That is why I always try to cross-refer so any comment can be seen as a related whole 'moment' in the continuous stream of the thread: malleability, adaptability, diversity, flexibility are my guiding goal posts through life!
No criticisms of course! Purely a passing moment of conversation!  Peter S. |
|
Dave
Administrator
HWI Admin
Posts: 7,700
|
Post by Dave on Feb 12, 2007 12:59:56 GMT
Hello Richard and Peter, My solution to the "losing continuity" problem when catching up by reading the chronological lists of posts is: before writing a reply to any post, open a new browser window for the relevant thread by right-clicking on the post title and reply from the new window (i.e. the actual thread). I also do this when encountering a particularly interesting post in the chronological list of posts if I want to read it in context. If I later come across any posts that I've already read when I opened a thread, I just skip past them. When I've finished, I close the new window and resume reading the chronological list from where I left off. Which is exactly what I am about to do now! I've just been away for the weekend and I'm working my way through 200 missed posts so this method is proving to be very handy!  But I cannot think of a way to get this thread back on topic...  Richard, help!!!  Cheers, Dave |
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Feb 12, 2007 15:11:23 GMT
Hello Dave, I'll get you out of trouble! Most of Lincolnshire is flat, but Lincoln Cathedral is on top of a hill and can be seen for miles. It's the perfect setting for Hayley's soaring vocals! i.postimg.cc/9fYxy370/smilie-big-grin.gifBest Wishes, Richard |
|
|
|
Post by roger on Feb 12, 2007 15:16:58 GMT
Sheesh! Now we're talking about flat land with a hill and seeing for miles. Even the off topic bit has gone off topic! ...  ...  |
|
|
|
Post by postscript on Feb 12, 2007 18:00:01 GMT
Sheesh! Now we're talking about flat land with a hill and seeing for miles. Even the off topic bit has gone off topic! ... ... Which surely means its well and truly ON topic? Wasn't that Keith's point, that when you are off topic that is the time when being off topic is on topic? Or am I simply more confused than I usually think I am? Peter S. |
|
|
|
Post by postscript on Feb 12, 2007 19:18:14 GMT
I can only\ think of doing a Richard--if he hasn't already done it which i'll find when I further catch up! Your suggestin is inSPIRing! Back on topic! Peter S PS: I have copied and pasted your suggestion and printed it out for further study. Have to go--its that dog's need again!  Peter S. |
|
Richard, help!!! 
...