|
|
Post by martindn on Apr 23, 2008 22:00:22 GMT
I think we willall just have to click on the search button a few more times them. I'll go there now and do 50 and see what happens.
Martin
|
|
|
|
Post by martindn on Apr 23, 2008 22:05:35 GMT
I've just been there again. Hayley was at 1948. I clicked on the search button 50 times. Nothing happened immediately.but we will see what happens in the fullness of time.
Martin
|
|
|
|
Post by sonata58 on Apr 24, 2008 13:00:32 GMT
Actually, I had never heard of Miley Cyrus until a few weeks ago when she guested on American Idol. I had never heard of her either until I saw Hannah Montana on T-shirts, handbags, food products, etc. Anyway, next time I see her I will tell her you asked and we'll see what happens!  Yes, please do! That way I would get a chance to see her live! I understand the situation Hayley would be in if she decides to tour the US. Meanwhile, I'm going to try to get her some more air time. We have a classical all-request show every week on one of my local radio station. Additionally, the host is a classical singer and voice teacher. So, Hayley will get introduced to more people, and, hopefully, rise up on the list! |
|
|
|
Post by sonata58 on Apr 29, 2008 20:26:50 GMT
Hey, I think I figured out how to help Hayley on this ranking. It seems that the XRank has undergone a few changes. It now has this track figure: help.live.com/help.aspx?project=wl_searchv1&querytype=keyword&query=knarx&mkt=en-US3 out of the 6 searches were mine. So, it seems that typing "Hayley Westenra" with a combination of something else (it doesn't necessarily have to be related) helps her XRank popularity. Just for the record she is at 1561 today in the musician category and 2193 in the celebrity. BTW, just in case you didn't know, performing a general live search pulls up the same results: www.live.com/ |
|
|
|
Post by martindn on May 3, 2008 22:41:55 GMT
Hey, she is up to no 572, just below Hank Marvin and above Helen Mirren. Maybe my repeated clicking on the search button did some good.
Martin
|
|
|
|
Post by martindn on May 6, 2008 20:57:42 GMT
Now 528 and has been higher (151 higher it says). I stuffed in another hundred searches, just to help.
Martin
|
|
|
|
Post by Nordly on May 6, 2008 21:32:25 GMT
Where is she that high on the list?
|
|
|
|
Post by stephanier on May 7, 2008 17:46:28 GMT
I really must diagree with a few of the forum members on this one!! Do you think Hayley would want people "clicking 50 times" to falsely inflate her ranking on this? The same way I hope they only counted one online vote per person for the Classical Brits. If Hayley wins, if her ranking goes up, I think, as the genuine person that she is, she would want it to be COMPLETELY legitimate. Not a false inflated result.
Stef R
|
|
|
|
Post by martindn on May 7, 2008 17:55:44 GMT
I really must diagree with a few of the forum members on this one!! Do you think Hayley would want people "clicking 50 times" to falsely inflate her ranking on this? The same way I hope they only counted one online vote per person for the Classical Brits. If Hayley wins, if her ranking goes up, I think, as the genuine person that she is, she would want it to be COMPLETELY legitimate. Not a false inflated result. Stef R Hi Sephanier, Point taken, but this is not competing for anything. If we can get Hayley near the top, it might get her noticed by a few more people. Isn't that worth doing? I'm sure we won't be the only ones doing it either. She's up to 449 now! keep clicking! Martin |
|
