|
Post by Bamafan on Feb 18, 2012 8:29:18 GMT
I'm not really sure which I like better: blonde or brunette. Brunette was her original colour, but she's just had the blonde for sooo long. In the end I went with blonde b/c 1: She seems to like it that way, & 2: I think it suits her well. And she might be doing something different soon. Wonder what it might be?? As to the issue of eyes, I'M SO CONFUSED. I mean in this picture, her eyes are clearly blue: But in this picture, her eyes are clearly green: -SO CONFUSED from Bama
|
|
|
Post by inga on Feb 18, 2012 8:43:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by inga on Feb 18, 2012 9:29:18 GMT
Brunette was her original colour, It is dark blonde, isn't it ?
|
|
|
Post by grant on Feb 18, 2012 9:31:24 GMT
Hi Bamafan Inga is right, both the images you posted are heavily photoshopped. Hayley's eyes are best described as blue/green. For more natural images of Hayley I suggest you look at some of those taken by members here posted on the various concert threads This one of mine was taken after the Llandudno concert last October. Best wishes Grant
|
|
|
Post by martindn on Feb 18, 2012 10:40:59 GMT
I suspect Grant's photo above is quite close to Hayley's natural hair and eye colours. All her family have similar colour hair (it is best to concentrate on the male members, since they are less likely to use dye). I have would describe Hayley's eyes as blue-grey, but then I have a slight red-green blindness that prevents me from seeing the green that some others detect.
Martin D
|
|
|
Post by gillette on Mar 3, 2014 1:54:00 GMT
Hi, Have had no trouble whatsoever getting used to Hayley's new hair style. I have liked it very much from first sight. It hasn't been so easy getting used to her change of color, however. The picture below haunts me on the hair color change. (She wouldn't fit in now!) BobS
|
|
|
Post by Bamafan on Mar 3, 2014 5:12:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Libby on Mar 3, 2014 5:29:16 GMT
The photo link is taking an hour to load (it seems like it). I'm giving up.. can you just post it? I see it's from my photobucket collection, however...
|
|
|
Post by gillette on Mar 3, 2014 6:11:15 GMT
The photo link is taking an hour to load (it seems like it). I'm giving up.. can you just post it? I see it's from my photobucket collection, however... Hi Libby, That is strange that you are having that trouble. I used your photobucket picture because I could get to it directly without scrolling. I'll give you a couple of different ways to get to it, but you will need to scroll. You have it posted over on the official site, also. (It is just the picture of the family showing them all to be blondes.) BobS hwi.proboards.com/thread/5811/christchurch-memorial-service-march-2011?page=5www.flickr.com/photos/logangorilla/5536756596/
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Mar 3, 2014 8:06:51 GMT
Hello Bob! I've just displayed the photograph in your earlier post with no trouble at all. Richard
|
|
|
Post by gillette on Mar 3, 2014 14:04:32 GMT
Hello Bob! I've just displayed the photograph in your earlier post with no trouble at all. Richard Thank you, Richard.
|
|
|
Post by Libby on Mar 4, 2014 6:46:22 GMT
I figured that was the photo. It's really quite easy to post photos, although it's different from before. But I like the new way better.
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Mar 4, 2014 8:50:54 GMT
Hello Libby! The old method using image tags still works, particularly if you want to shrink an image to a certain size, as I did with the left hand picture here: Richard
|
|
|
Post by Libby on Mar 5, 2014 6:36:13 GMT
Hello Libby! The old method using image tags still works, particularly if you want to shrink an image to a certain size, as I did with the left hand picture here: Richard Good to know, but I never could get the size code down, and honestly, I'd rather get used to the new way.
|
|
|
Post by Richard on Mar 5, 2014 8:34:58 GMT
Hello Libby! If you ever want to reduce the size of an image to match it with another, just use this code: [img width=xxx height=xxx]URL of image[/img] In normal circumstances I prefer the new method too. Richard
|
|